Fredrik Nietzsche:
Looking at the world, the state of consciousness can be present in different stages or levels. In an ordinary level, things are practical and are valued for their function. The level of an artist’s consciousness would be at a different level, objects are not valued for their function or purpose but instead, they are valued for the ecstatic qualities.
Life itself would gain purpose only by looking at the world with an artistic consciousness.
While seeing an object you get your first impression, your basic consciousness. This is followed by questing it, creating a perspective from several angles. Perhaps, does the object look ecstatically pleasing? This leads us to the third level of consciousness. Again questioning why but in this case it is: ”why do you like or dislike the object? What part of you makes your opinion?” This is making you more appreciative of ordinary life and more understanding of other people’s opinions.

(Marcel Duchamp, Bicycle wheel, 1913/64)
Two familiar objects put together destroying any function they previously had. Frost to be looked at from a new perspective, a higher level of consciousness if you so will.
Jacques Lacan:
Understanding people is like to understand how the person was formed. The human goes through a mirror stage at six to eighteen months of age. Until this period a child won’t be able to identify the reflection in the mirror as itself. A person will also separate himself from his mother and designate his identity more (the ego develops) and the interference of the father in this process directs the person’s desires.
The world is driven by people’s desire rather than a reason. It is needed to recognize your own desires. Then the person can understand the subject through the symbolic, the imaginary and the real. Understand the message, not the person.

(Salvador Dali, Galatea of the spheres, 1952)
This painting by Dail reflects on how life is build up by endless numbers of small particles. In the time of the development of nuclear power and atom-bombs. But I think it is a great representation for all the history that is in a person, History that could have taken many different paths. A see-through view on the history that defines us
Gilles Deleuze:
Deleuze is embracing creativity in sociology, politics, education, and art. He sees the world is unpredictable. Deleuze rejects rationalism and states that philosophy should bring forward the answer to ”What are we doing?”. We shouldn’t bother with the question: ”What is there?”.
Deleuze wanted to free the individual from the Modernist social structure. To free one’s identity to let it flux, to embrace difference, impermanence, contradiction, non-identity, and simulacra.

(Rene Magritte, The son of a man, 1964)
In this painting, everything is clear of what is there, more interesting is what it is doing there. the peculiar position of the apple making the man in the picture anonymous and we can’t say much about the person in the picture, maybe nothing more then, we see a son of a man.
Jean Baudrillard:
Life is simulated! We are given freedom in a form of illusion, the choice between baying a red car or a blue car, this car or that car. In our society, we are rather fed a simulation of reality, through TV then experience it first hand. The notion of being in a simulation would prudes panic in society but TV and entertainment, hyperreality is suppressing this notion and reassures society of reality.

(Frank Yang, I don’t like nature, 2018)
In our reality, many are following the societies norms and preconceived ideas. The avatar in the picture plays on this and makes contrast trough out the picture. The intellectual with a violin, the stupid with muscle and the virtual reality in the middle of nature.
Michel Foucault:
Philosophy is a tool to help people overcome de suppressive nature of dominant and controlling institutions. Thinking for your self brings confidence and rational ethics because you can argue for your thought you can be confident in them. This gives power-structures a new edge in favor of the common person. Power, knowledge and the body, these three are Foucault’s trinity of a power structure.

(Frida Carlo, What the water gave me, 1938)
Can we restrain the mind? Foucault’s study of prisoners shows you can constrain the mind, being within high security the sense of all ways being surveilled becomes present. With even this I believe your creativity, your imagination has the power to liberate you to levels the physical can’t impose itself on.